In celebration of our 5th anniversary as a couple, I bought Michele
her long sought after G5 tower and some goodies to go with it.
Included in these was another new printer, a pretty kicking Epson
Stylus 2400.
I hated to replace the Xerox Phaser we only bought last year, but we
were both disappointed with the amount of work that went in to
prepping images for that printer, especially for the results being
produced. While they were good, I feel the Epson will do much
better. The test prints we've made are already surpassing the
results we were getting after a year of tinkering with the Xerox.
This leads to our poll question, since we will have to change paper
stocks to take best advantage of the new machine. These machines
seem to be optimized for printing on a glossier stock, much like you
would get with a photograph. I personally LOVE the new look, but I
wanted to get the opinion of Michele's fans on this potential
change. Would a change in the paper stock of the prints influence
your decision to buy at all?
Please cast your votes and help steer our course once again.
Thanks!
Eric
PS - It's 1990's Ladies Night on Furbid this week! Check out the details over on
EDIT:
Polls are now closed!! Please see next entry for details. Thanks, everyone!
Poll #718078 Does the paper matter? Let us know!
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 36
We have recently acquired a new printer, which means we will have to change our print paper stock. Would printing images on a glossy paper stock, like a photograph, make you:
View Answers
| More likely to buy? |
| Less likely to buy? |
| Paper doesn't matter, it's the image that counts! |
April 27 2006, 17:11:51 UTC 6 years ago
I've never been happy with the glossy paper in our printer.
The Semi Gloss could win my over too, especially the Ilford and the Kodak papers. These are my favorite for photographs, and I think we'll have to try a art print run using the semi-gloss.
April 27 2006, 17:16:14 UTC 6 years ago
Good idea, we'll add those to the list
I found Epson's double sided heavy matte paper, which did alright. The photo paper just punched up the colors much better than the matte.We shall see - thanks!
Eric
April 27 2006, 17:38:44 UTC 6 years ago
April 27 2006, 17:23:24 UTC 6 years ago
April 27 2006, 17:26:12 UTC 6 years ago
Thanks for the help, Heather!
Eric
April 27 2006, 17:25:05 UTC 6 years ago
Also, congrats on your 5th anniversary!
April 27 2006, 17:57:56 UTC 6 years ago
I had a whole line of glossy 8.5 x 11 prints for a while. I was printing on an Epson printer and using Kodak Premium Glossy paper. Then I noticed the prints were growing darker with age. I promptly discontinued them! I think it was the Kodak Paper.
The Epson Premium Glossy Paper holds color much better, but I still distrust the glossy finish.
(Strangely, the Epson Premium 11" x 17" glossy paper holds color good and doesn't shift. I never noticed any change. I still use that for my matted Jumbo prints.)
Also, the trouble with Glossy for 8.5" x 11" prints is that when you put them in your print book, the glossy finish tends to 'stick' to the plastic of the protector sheets. :(
I use Epson Heavyweight Matte Single Sided Paper for my prints. It holds it's color perfectly, is nice and heavy, and is all around great. No need for you to waste extra money on the Double-Sided. It's exactly the same as the Single Sided, except that the back is coated for printing. Since you won't be printing on the back, getting this is a useless waste of money and doesn't add any value to the buyers. I only use it for my double-sided printing projects such as Christmas Cards.
Good choice on the Epson too. I love love love my Epson 1280.
April 27 2006, 18:45:08 UTC 6 years ago
Glossy seems to be losing amongst the pros ...
But that's OK - it's why I'm asking! ^_^The Premium Photo paper that Epson makes seems to be resisting finger printing so far. According to Epson's color fastness tests the 2400 K3 inks on their paper are good for longer than I'll be alive. We've always used the archival sleeves that aren't supposed to stick, although we haven't tried them with this paper yet.
We have a stock of single sided heavyweight matte by Epson, I'll try printing on those too. Whee, it's an adventure!
Thanks Brenda!
Eric
April 27 2006, 19:02:53 UTC 6 years ago
Re: Glossy seems to be losing amongst the pros ...
I know I already sent a message to the Yahoo group, but I see I forgot to mention the stickiness versus plastic sleeves. I'm not a professional by any stretch, but I keep most of my prints in a book, and if I suddenly found they were sticking to the sleeves, I'd be very annoyed.April 27 2006, 21:43:55 UTC 6 years ago
As a side note, as a person who does maintenance to printers professionally, the Epson is a better choice of printer. ... but what are you going to do with the Phaser?
April 27 2006, 21:46:14 UTC 6 years ago
We'll throw in a hernia free of charge! ^_^
Eric
April 27 2006, 22:55:50 UTC 6 years ago
April 27 2006, 23:21:22 UTC 6 years ago